
Dystopian Dremin': L.A. Goes To Pieces
[Again] [LA Weekly/Aug 29/1996/US] By David L. Ulin
At the beginning of John Carpenter's
Escape From L.A., the sequel to the director's 1981 science-fiction
thriller, Escape From New York, there's a brief prologue that describes
the decline and fall of Los Angeles. In 1998, a fundamentalist presidential
candidate predicts that a massive earthquake will wipe out the L.A. Basin in
divine retribution for its having been a "city of sin." Two years later, it
happens: a 9.6 topples freeways and buildings and ultimately unmoors Los Angeles
from North America altogether, leaving it a freestanding island off the Pacific
coast. Almost immediately L.A. is established as a deportation point for
undesirable convicted of moral crimes against a new Christian government of the
United States. By the time the movie proper begins, it's 2013, and Los Angeles
is very much a city of the damned.
To call such a premise far-fetched would be overstating the obvious, but
Escape From L.A. has no pretensions toward subtlety; it's just an excuse for
the return of Kurt Russell's one-eyed gruff, tough, antihero. Snake Plissken.
When we last saw Snake, he was bringing back a kidnapped president from
maximum-security Manhattan; now he's infiltrating Los Angeles to rescue the
daughter of a different chief executive from the clutches of a Che Guevara
look-alike named Cuervo Jones. Among the way, he comes across an assortment of
Southern California stereotypes, from Steve Buscemi's Maps to the Stars Eddie,
with his convertible and deals, to the plastic-surgery ghouls of Beverly Hills,
who prowl the streets looking for fresh body parts to keep their faces lifted
and tummies tucked.
On the most fundamental level, Escape From L.A. is a terrible movie, but
what's interesting is the way that the picture functions as a metaphor for the
dystopian fantasy Los Angeles has become. From the moment Snake lands his
nuclear-powered submarine along L.A.'s fissured coastline and witnesses a
drive-by on Mulholland Drive, it's clear that the Los Angeles of 2013 has pushed
the obsessions of the present to new heights. Like Escape From New York
before it, Escape From L.A. seeks to portray the ultimate in urban
nightmares - a city where lawlessness has become the rule of law. It's an
extreme position, but not uncommon: just last week I spent several hours talking
to a former resident who insisted that he wouldn't set foot in Los Angeles on a
dare.
We've been here before. Raymond Chandler, who once described L.A. as "a big
hard-boiled city with no more personality than a paper cup," influenced a long
line of L.A. interpreters from Ross MacDonald to Ridley Scott, whose movie
Blade Runner defines a vision of the future so prevalent as to become a
cliché. Yet if Chandler pitied the city for being "lost and beaten and full of
loneliness," he could also see it as "rich and vigorous and full of pride." In
the world of Escape From L.A., though, there is no longer room for pride,
or maybe all that's left is just the pride of the kill. Everyone is armed and
looking for the slightest provocation to shoot, an image of Los Angeles that
comes directly from the nightly news. After all, in the wake of the riots - not
to mention the floods, fires and earthquakes - L.A. has come to be defined by
its disasters, emerging as the apocalyptic landscape of our collective dreams.
It's hardly surprising, then, to hear Escape From L.A.'s creators say
they were inspired by Northridge, even if one such cataclysm could not possible
be inspiration enough.
Throughout Escape From L.A., Carpenter - with fellow writers Russell and
Debra Hill - attempts to mitigate the bleakness, interjecting pallid humor and
even some philosophy in between the violence. Toward the middle of the movie,
Snake rescues a woman named Taslima from certain death at the hands of the
Surgeon General of Beverly Hills. In gratitude, Taslima leads Snake down a
broken freeway toward the lair of Cuervo Jones. As they make their way through
the desolation, he asks why she hasn't tried to escape. Taslima doesn't miss a
beat. "L.A. is still the place," she says. "This is the only free zone left."
Snake throws her a quizzical look. "Dark paradise," he barks. At once a burst of
random gunfire explodes across the night-swept freeway, and Taslima is killed.
Here, freedom is a dangerous business, and chaos the price for the privilege of
feeling alive. It's an odd point to make from within a prison, but also the
fulcrum of the entire movie, as well as the moment that best articulates the
realities of mid-1990s Los Angeles. Taslima's remark is a world-weary shrug at
the indignities of living in a place that most nonresidents like to think as
hell.. It's precisely the sort of comment for which New Yorkers used to be
famous, but since the early '90s has increasingly come to reflect Los Angeles'
attitude about itself, from laid-back and illusory to unrelentingly real. When
Cuervo Jones says to Snake, during Escape From L.A.'s gladiatorial scene
[staged with a nice bit of irony at the Los Angeles Coliseum]. "You're about to
find out that this fucking city can kill anybody," the implication is that he's
talking about anybody except those strong enough to live here on whatever
terms apply. And in a landscape where such terms are constantly shifting, the
strongest are those best able to adapt to a world in which uncertainty is the
only thing that's sure.
A film of such small originality that its precursor as a point-by-point
narrative guide, Escape From L.A. has, by its very existence, something
to tell us about the mythic status of the place where we live. Fifteen years
ago, Escape From New York presented a vision of New York that was, if
unlikely, then at least a vivid extrapolation of a city in seeming decline. It
wasn't alone in this. In My Dinner With Andre, which was released the
same year as Carpenter's film, Andre Gregory described an encounter with an
English botanist who declared, "I think that New York is the new model for the
new concentration camp where the camp has been built by the inmates themselves,
and the inmates are the guards." Escape From L.A. is not that astute
about its assumptions: it's a far more reactionary piece of work. But it leaves
us to confront the notion that Los Angeles is now the model to which Gregory's
friend refers, a "dark paradise" where not even the future can be assured.